Legal Citation Text Classification
Legal Industry - Citations Text Classification
@kaggle.shivamb_legal_citation_text_classification
Legal Text Classification
@kaggle.shivamb_legal_citation_text_classification.legal_text_classification
- 25.63 MB
- 24985 rows
- 4 columns
case_idCase Id | case_outcomeCase Outcome | case_titleCase Title | case_textCase Text |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case1 | cited | Alpine Hardwood (Aust) Pty Ltd v Hardys Pty Ltd (No 2) [2002] FCA 224 ; (2002) 190 ALR 121 | Ordinarily that discretion will be exercised so that costs follow the event and are awarded on a party and party basis. A departure from normal practice to award indemnity costs requires some special or unusual feature in the case: Alpine Hardwood (Aust) Pty Ltd v Hardys Pty Ltd (No 2) [2002] FCA 22… |
| Case2 | cited | Black v Lipovac [1998] FCA 699 ; (1998) 217 ALR 386 | The general principles governing the exercise of the discretion to award indemnity costs after rejection by an unsuccessful party of a so called Calderbank letter were set out in the judgment of the Full Court in Black v Lipovac [1998] FCA 699 ; (1998) 217 ALR 386. In summary those principles are: 1… |
| Case3 | cited | Colgate Palmolive Co v Cussons Pty Ltd (1993) 47 FCR 225 | Ordinarily that discretion will be exercised so that costs follow the event and are awarded on a party and party basis. A departure from normal practice to award indemnity costs requires some special or unusual feature in the case: Alpine Hardwood (Aust) Pty Ltd v Hardys Pty Ltd (No 2) [2002] FCA 22… |
| Case4 | cited | Dais Studio Pty Ltd v Bullett Creative Pty Ltd [2008] FCA 42 | The general principles governing the exercise of the discretion to award indemnity costs after rejection by an unsuccessful party of a so called Calderbank letter were set out in the judgment of the Full Court in Black v Lipovac [1998] FCA 699 ; (1998) 217 ALR 386. In summary those principles are: 1… |
| Case5 | cited | Dr Martens Australia Pty Ltd v Figgins Holdings Pty Ltd (No 2) [2000] FCA 602 | The preceding general principles inform the exercise of the discretion. That discretion is not to be fettered by transformation of approaches and practices developed through the cases into quasi statutory rules. In John S Hayes & Associates Pty Ltd v Kimberly-Clark Australia Pty Ltd (1994) 52 FC… |
| Case6 | cited | GEC Marconi Systems Pty Ltd v BHP Information Technology Pty Ltd [2003] FCA 688 ; (2003) 201 ALR 55 | I accept that the making of a rolled up offer inclusive of costs and interest may detract from the weight to be given to its refusal in the exercise of the discretion. Finn J referred to authorities on the point in GEC Marconi Systems Pty Ltd v BHP Information Technology Pty Ltd [2003] FCA 688 ; (20… |
| Case7 | cited | John S Hayes & Associates Pty Ltd v Kimberly-Clark Australia Pty Ltd (1994) 52 FCR 201 | The preceding general principles inform the exercise of the discretion. That discretion is not to be fettered by transformation of approaches and practices developed through the cases into quasi statutory rules. In John S Hayes & Associates Pty Ltd v Kimberly-Clark Australia Pty Ltd (1994) 52 FC… |
| Case8 | cited | Seven Network Limited v News Limited (2007) 244 ALR 374 | On the question of the level of unreasonableness necessary to attract the discretion, I respectfully agree with the comment of Sackville J in Seven Network Limited v News Limited (2007) 244 ALR 374 at [62] questioning the utility of substituting a requirement that rejection be "plainly unreasonable"… |
| Case9 | applied | Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O'Neill [2006] HCA 46 | recent decision of the High Court in Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O'Neill [2006] HCA 46 clarifies this issue. Gleeson CJ and Crennan J (at [19]), after referring to various cases dealing with the grant of interlocutory injunctions in cases of defamation, formulated the general principles go… |
| Case10 | followed | Hexal Australia Pty Ltd v Roche Therapeutics Inc (2005) 66 IPR 325 | Hexal Australia Pty Ltd v Roche Therapeutics Inc (2005) 66 IPR 325, the likelihood of irreparable harm was regarded by Stone J as, indeed, a separate element that had to be established by an applicant for an interlocutory injunction. Her Honour cited the well-known passage from the judgment of Mason… |
CREATE TABLE legal_text_classification (
"case_id" VARCHAR,
"case_outcome" VARCHAR,
"case_title" VARCHAR,
"case_text" VARCHAR
);